3, joins them, I thought the video game was more faithful to the essence of the character, which is one that is inherently at war with itself. While I didn’t mind James Gunn making Warlock into a man-child who at first opposes the Guardians and then, in a post-credits scene at the end of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. Speaking of Adam Warlock, both the movie and the game use the longtime Marvel character in interesting ways. Adam Warlock actually kicks butt in the game Image used with permission by copyright holder Plus, the game has the added bonus of numerous side villains like the Dweller-in-Darkness and Fing Fang Foom, who offer more of an interesting variety than Vol. There was a point in the final act of the game that I wondered out loud how the heck the Guardians could ever defeat such a foe the Magus was that powerful, and that good of a villain. Marvel’s Guardians of the Game has a far better villain in the Magus, the dark side of Adam Warlock who manifests as a being of pure energy that, through a series of surprisingly easy-to-follow plot developments, tries to take over the universe via a religious cult called the Universal Church of Truth. 3, the villain is reduced to a campy, scenery-chewing stereotype who is more annoying than threatening. A few of those involved the High Evolutionary, an imposing and menacing Darwinian genetic scientist who experimented on animals in Wundagore Mountain and caused all kinds of trouble for the Avengers. I’ve been reading Marvel Comics for a while now, and some of my favorites involve absolutely batshit stories from the 1970s and 1980s. 3’s campy High Evolutionary Image used with permission by copyright holder The video game has a better villain than Vol. Note: This article contains spoilers for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |